← Contracts

Limitation of Liability Clauses: What They Cap in Michigan

A limitation of liability clause decides how much you can lose when a deal goes wrong. What these caps cover, where Michigan courts may draw the line, and what to negotiate.

By · September 17, 2026
Limitation of Liability Clauses: What They Cap in Michigan

Most people read the price, the timeline, and the cancellation terms. The clause that decides how much you can actually lose usually sits near the end, in capital letters nobody wants to read.

That's the limitation of liability clause. If the other side causes you real damage, it may decide whether you recover your losses or just a refund of what you paid. If you're the one providing the service, it may be the only thing standing between one bad project and your whole business. For help reviewing or drafting one, see our contracts practice.

What a limitation of liability clause does

A limitation of liability clause sets a ceiling on what one party (or both) can owe if something goes wrong under the contract. It usually works in two ways.

1. A dollar cap. The most common version says total liability won't exceed a set amount, often:

  • The fees paid under the contract
  • The fees paid in the last 6 or 12 months
  • A fixed number, like $10,000 or $100,000
  • The limits of an insurance policy

2. A damages waiver. Many clauses also exclude whole categories of damages, most often consequential, indirect, incidental, special, and punitive damages. In plain terms, that can mean no recovery for lost profits, lost business, or the ripple effects of a failure, even if those are the biggest losses you suffer.

Here's how that plays out. A web developer's mistake takes your online store down for two weeks during your busiest season. Your direct damages might be the cost of fixing the site. Your lost sales could be many times that. If the contract waives consequential damages and caps liability at the fees you paid, you may be looking at a refund of a few thousand dollars against a much larger loss.

Are limitation of liability clauses enforceable in Michigan?

Generally, yes. Michigan courts tend to respect the deal businesses make, and parties are usually free to allocate risk between themselves, including limiting liability for ordinary negligence. If you signed it, you should assume a court may hold you to it.

But there are limits, and they matter.

Gross negligence and intentional misconduct

Courts are much less willing to let a party contract its way out of responsibility for gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing. A clause that tries to excuse reckless or deliberate conduct may not hold up, even if the wording covers it. Well-drafted clauses usually carve these out on purpose.

Sales of goods and the UCC

When the contract is for the sale of goods, Michigan's version of the Uniform Commercial Code applies. Under MCL 440.2719, parties can limit remedies and exclude consequential damages, but not where the limitation is unconscionable. The statute also treats a limit on consequential damages for personal injury from consumer goods as presumptively unconscionable. And if an exclusive remedy (like "repair or replace only") fails of its essential purpose, other remedies may come back into play.

Clarity and fairness

A clause buried in fine print, written in confusing terms, or forced on a party with no real bargaining power is more vulnerable to challenge. Courts look at the language itself. Ambiguous limitation language may be read against the party who drafted it.

Claims outside the contract

Some claims, like fraud, don't fit neatly inside a contract's limits. A party who lied to get you to sign may not be able to hide behind the cap. How far that goes depends heavily on the facts.

None of this means a clause will be thrown out. It means the details of the wording, the type of deal, and the conduct involved all matter.

The carve-outs that do the real work

The most important part of a limitation of liability clause is often what it doesn't cap. Common carve-outs include:

  • Gross negligence, willful misconduct, and fraud
  • Confidentiality breaches. A leak of your trade secrets or customer data can cost far more than the contract price.
  • Indemnification obligations. If the other side promised to cover third-party claims, a low cap can quietly gut that promise. We cover how those promises work in Who Pays If You Get Sued? The Indemnification Clause.
  • Intellectual property infringement. If a vendor's work infringes someone else's rights and you get sued, you'll want that risk outside the cap.
  • Unpaid fees. Service providers often carve out the client's obligation to pay, so the cap can't be used to dodge the invoice.

When a cap has no carve-outs at all, read it as a warning sign, whichever side of the deal you're on.

Which side of the clause are you on?

How you approach this clause depends on your role.

If you're the one providing the service or product, a sensible cap protects you from losses wildly out of proportion to what you're being paid. A freelancer earning $5,000 on a project generally shouldn't be exposed to a client's $500,000 business loss. A cap tied to fees, a consequential damages waiver, and adequate insurance can make that risk manageable.

If you're the one hiring, the same clause can leave you holding most of the risk. Before you sign, ask:

  • Is the cap high enough to cover a realistic worst case?
  • Does it apply to both sides, or just to them?
  • Are the carve-outs there, especially confidentiality, data, and IP?
  • Does the other side carry insurance that matches the risk?

A mutual clause, where both parties' liability is capped the same way, is often easier to negotiate than a one-sided one.

Common mistakes

  • Treating it as boilerplate. Template contracts often include a cap that fits nobody's actual deal. We explain why in Should You Use a Template Contract?
  • Setting the cap at the fees for a low-dollar, high-risk job. If the job is cheap but a failure would be expensive, a fee-based cap may not fit.
  • Forgetting the waiver. Parties sometimes negotiate the dollar cap and miss that consequential damages were excluded entirely.
  • Contradicting yourself. A strong indemnity promise paired with a tiny cap and no carve-out sends mixed signals, and mixed signals invite a dispute.
  • Ignoring insurance. The cap and your insurance coverage should make sense together.

When to call ELN

Call us before you sign a contract with a liability cap you don't fully understand, or when you're drafting your own terms and want a cap that protects your business without scaring off good clients. We'll read the clause against the actual risk in your deal, check the carve-outs, and help you negotiate language that fits.

Already dealing with a loss and wondering whether the cap applies? That's worth a conversation too. Schedule a consultation or visit our contracts practice.

You Call You Win.

More from Contracts

View all Contracts posts → · All categories →